Unpalatable preemption is generally better than reentry vehicles coming down your chimney.
A thought experiment: would the world be a better place if the US had preemptively attacked the USSR in the 50s or early 60s when it was possible to do without more than “get[ting] our hair mussed” as General Turgidson put it?
The problem there is you can't prove anything would have come down the chimney if the preemption is successful, so people will still be unhappy.