logoalt Hacker News

SoftTalkerlast Tuesday at 3:04 PM4 repliesview on HN

I went one step farther and quit taking photos. And this is after many years of hobbiest photography in the film era, had a darkroom at home, SLR with several lenses. Early digital cameras were underwhelming, basically the equivalent of a 110 film snapshot camera. By the time they got good I had started to reflect on the fact that I almost never went back and looked at any of the photos I'd taken, so I just stopped. Now although with my mobile phone I have a quite decent camera in my pocket all the time, I rarely use it. The "ohh I should take a picture of this" impulse just never enters my mind anymore. I enjoy the moment, and have the memories.


Replies

RankingMemberlast Tuesday at 7:50 PM

> I enjoy the moment, and have the memories.

I don't disagree with your "enjoy the moment" thesis, but I also envy your memory recall capability. For me, photos can resurrect memories I don't have access to normally.

show 1 reply
CarVaclast Tuesday at 3:10 PM

It really depends on the person.

I do not take photos for the memories, I take photos for art and I do go back and look at them.

show 2 replies
tombertlast Tuesday at 3:16 PM

My phone camera is often just a very utilitarian thing, like taking a picture of a receipt and stuff like that. When I do take pictures for fun, it's almost always just a selfie to send people when I'm on vacation.

I don't really see the point of taking vacation photos that don't have me (or whomever I'm traveling with) in them; you can find higher quality photos of virtually anything I'd take a picture of on the internet for free; the only thing I can realistically add to the photo is me!

bambaxlast Tuesday at 3:13 PM

> Early digital cameras were underwhelming, basically the equivalent of a 110 film snapshot camera.

One of the first digital Ixus (IV maybe? from 2000?) made images of just one megapixels, but they were amazing. I miss that thing.