logoalt Hacker News

cmrdporcupinetoday at 1:06 AM2 repliesview on HN

I think WP was just too late to the party honestly by the time they got around to actually seriously considering/doing what they said they would do, there were already established good word processors on the ST.

WP did eventually come to the ST and if I recall it was panned as a horrible port. I think there was talk of MS Word, too, and also a flop?

Mine came with 1st Word Plus, and it was excellent for the time.


Replies

lproventoday at 2:35 PM

> I think there was talk of MS Word, too, and also a flop?

There was a port of MS Word, and it worked well. For some strange historical reasons I can't recall now, though, it was called and marketed as MS Write instead.

Write was the extremely basic free wordprocessor in Windows 3.x -- and so the name did the ST version a grave disservice.

https://www.atarimagazines.com/startv3n1/microsoftwrite.html

TMWNNtoday at 1:13 AM

>I think WP was just too late to the party honestly

Nothing with the power of WordPerfect.

Hundreds of word processors were developed for DOS. Hundreds. Word, WordStar, and MultiMate, all developed by very large companies, were only the best known.

WordPerfect beat them all.

Feel free to claim that the ST or Amiga word processor developed by two guys somewhere in the UK has more features c. 1989.

show 3 replies