>Totally disagree this is what would happen.
Doesn't matter if you agree that would happen, the analogy is valid - you're essentially admitting that you're ignoring the negative impacts of the tech for the sake of how impressive it is.
Im not sure you understand the conversation we are having.
I have said about 3 times I am solely judging tech by how impressive it is technically.
I have no idea who you are arguing with.
Im not sure you understand the conversation we are having.
I have said about 3 times I am solely judging tech by how impressive it is technically.
I have no idea who you are arguing with.