logoalt Hacker News

vehemenzyesterday at 4:27 PM1 replyview on HN

If you're going to say Apple's reputational hit from Tahoe, and Tahoe's many problems, are merely narrative-driven, you need to at least provide support for that. For example:

- why the added transparency effects don't present accessibility/usability issues, despite what users report

- why the corner radius change (among other UI changes), including its absurd size and broken handle detection actually aren't a big deal (even though every other window toolkit NOT swiftui has to be updated for it)

- why it's okay that they added useless icons to menus that add visual clutter and violate of their own design standards

- why Rosetta is going away, even though so many things still depend on it

The bigger issue is that Tahoe was a frivolous cosmetic update with only a few actual improvements, despite all of macOS's bugs that haven't been fixed over the years. That's a long list, from broken keyboard shortcuts in most their newer apps (and System Settings) to persistent Airplay compatibility problems.

Why is Apple's hardware getting objective better over the years while the possible software gains are squandered year after year?


Replies

caconym_yesterday at 4:45 PM

I am talking about "liquid glass", which I understand to refer to the recent design language updates that include the much-bemoaned transparent/translucent design elements. I will repeat that I simply have not experienced myself having a negative reaction to these changes, even if you include corner radius changes and what you call "visual clutter" under the umbrella of "liquid glass"; I hardly noticed the former and didn't notice the latter at all. As for accessibility issues, I explicitly called them out in my comment.

Re: the rest of your comment, it seems like a real stretch to suggest that any of the following (quoting you) are within the scope of "liquid glass":

* Dropping Rosetta.

* Broken keyboard shortcuts in most their newer apps (and System Settings).

* Persistent Airplay compatibility problems.

* Other bugs that haven't been fixed over the years.

* Possible software gains being squandered year after year.

I clearly articulated in my comment that I have other problems with the current state of mac OS, so I'm not sure why you're implying that I'm claiming all the issues mentioned in your post are in the scope of "liquid glass" and therefore mainly narrative-driven.

It suggests to me that you didn't really read my comment before composing your reply.