I was reading an essay by Kant called “what is Enlightenment?” It argues that people should be permitted to say whatever they wanted, provided they obey the laws.

He bases it on the idea that we should not be subject to be “lifelong tuteledge.” At some point we must speak up and contribute.

We can be wrong. Very wrong. We can advise our rulers to do terrible things. The Holocaust hadn’t happened yet, but the Wars of Relgion had - he knew how bad people could be.

Europe doesn’t seem to reject lifelong tuteledge any more. There want opinion and thought to be guided and formed by an elite class, not a noisy crowd of peers.

This is new. It was foreign to Kant, foreign to Locke, Hobbes, Marx, etc.

It’s a bit scary the Europe is leading the way on this. And it does seem they are poking at speech specifically.

Most recently the EU is considering a “ban conversion therapy.” Not medical malpractice legislation - just a very specific type of medical malpractice that has a very specific political constituency.

Meanwhile people who are subject to quacky things like past life regression or Freudian analysis are left with the normal malpractice system.

Really Europe (and other places) are using it as a way to weaken freedom of speech.

Maybe I’m connecting dots where there are none, but there seems to be a big international shift away from free speech, with Europe taking the lead.

In America this manifests itself as “it would be nice if we could restrict speech like normal countries do, but we have to worry about the Republicans, so let’s not do that - yet.”

But it’s pretty clear free speech is going the way of right to bear arms and trial by jury.