logoalt Hacker News

1a527dd5today at 9:20 AM4 repliesview on HN

I appreciate performance as much as the next person; but I see this endless battle to measure things in ns/us/ms as performative.

Sure there are 0.000001% edge cases where that MIGHT be the next big bottleneck.

I see the same thing repeated in various front end tooling too. They all claim to be _much_ faster than their counterpart.

9/10 whatever tooling you are using now will be perfectly fine. Example; I use grep a lot in an ad hoc manner on really large files I switch to rg. But that is only in the handful of cases.


Replies

lemageduragetoday at 10:13 AM

True. I feel like the main way a tool could differentiate from jq is having more intuitive syntax and many real world examples to show off the syntax.

show 1 reply
montrosertoday at 9:26 AM

Then this is for the handful of cases for you. When it matters it matters.

mikojantoday at 10:06 AM

> I see the same thing repeated in various front end tooling too. They all claim to be _much_ faster than their counterpart.

>

> 9/10 whatever tooling you are using now will be perfectly fine

Are you working in frontend? On non-trivial webapps? Because this is entirely wrong in my experience. Performance issues are the #1 complaint of everyone on the frontend team. Be that in compiling, testing or (to a lesser extend) the actual app.

show 3 replies
dalvrosatoday at 9:25 AM

Fair, but agentic tooling can benefit quite a lot from this

Opencode, ClaudeCode, etc, feel slow. Whatever make them faster is a win :)

show 2 replies