logoalt Hacker News

janalsncmyesterday at 11:34 PM1 replyview on HN

I personally think it is much more important to have strong statistical intuitions rather than intuitions about what neural networks are doing.

The latter isn’t wrong or useless. It’s simply not something a typical software engineer will need.

On the other hand, wiring up LLMs into an application is very popular and may be an engineer’s first experience with systems that are fundamentally chaotic. Knowing the difference between precision and recall and when you care about them will get you a lot more bang for your buck.

I would suggest the gateway drug into ML for most engineers is something like: we have a task and it can currently be done for X dollars. But maybe we can do it for a tenth of the price with a different API call. Or maybe there’s something on Huggingface that does the same thing for a fixed hourly cost, hundreds of times cheaper in practice.


Replies

jmatthewsyesterday at 11:41 PM

I'm just trying to develop the lens where I can see a problem and know what properties of it are meaningful from an ML standpoint.

Coming from a specific domain where I have a sharpened instinct for how things are haven't really given me the ability to decompose the problem using ML primitives. That's what I'm working on.