Also, having one standard packaging format and registry doesn't preclude having alternatives for special use cases.
There should be a happy path for the majority of C++ use cases so that I can make a package, publish it and consume other people's packages. Anyone who wants to leave that happy path can do so freely at their own risk.
The important thing is to get one system blessed as The C++ Package Format by the standard to avoid xkcd 927 issues.
That would actually be pretty cool. Though I think there might have been papers written on this a few years ago. Does anyone know of these or have any updates about them?
In the Linux world and even Haiku, there is a standard package dependacy format, so dependencies aren’t really a problem. Even OSX has Homebrew. Windows is the odd man out.