> It's unethical (if not outright fraudulent) to publish LLM work as if it were your own.

I disagree on that. It's really a gray area.

If it's some lazy vibecoded shit, I think what you say totally applies.

If the human did the thinking, gave the agent detailed instructions, and/or carefully reviewed the output, then I don't think it's so clear cut.

And full disclosure, I'm reacting more to copilot here, which lists itself as the author and you as the co-author. I'm not giving credit to the machine, like I'm some appendage to it (which is totally what the powers-that-be want me to become).

> Claude setting itself as coauthor is a good way to address this problem, and it doing so by default is a very good thing.

I do agree that's a sensible default.