logoalt Hacker News

Den_VRyesterday at 10:19 PM2 repliesview on HN

It was a 6.6 billion dollar plan to alleviate famine in 43 countries for one year, so, no.


Replies

zimpenfishtoday at 8:24 AM

On the other hand, it would have alleviated famine in 43 countries for one year and if your response to that is "but that's not ending world hunger and I will not do it", you really need a long hard look at yourself.

But then again, Musk is going to turn out to be one of the great mass killers of world history with his destruction of USAID. Why would he spoil that by helping some folks?

XorNottoday at 12:22 AM

Also famines are political problems to start with. We have more then enough food. Getting it to people reliably is the issue - i.e. there's usually a plethora of other issues like an active war.

It also isn't an economically isolated enterprise: Ukrainian grain shipments traversing into Europe via Polish roads and not heading to Africa via their ports caused a bunch of price crashes which became political flashpoints.

show 1 reply