> The Quincy Institute exists to push their "restraint/realpolitic" agenda

Every think tank exist to further their agenda… do you have a more substantive critique?

This comment did catch my attention. While I am willing to accept some level of bias from various parties, I have an odd feeling that we about to argue that reality is in the eye of the beholder.

With that in mind, what do you think the reality is? I am not leading you on. I am genuinely curious.