logoalt Hacker News

nancyminusoneyesterday at 6:05 PM4 repliesview on HN

Do you watch sports, football, the Olympics? If not I'm sure you know someone who does. Same category as this. Each of the 32 NFL team is worth about the cost of 1-2 Artemis launches. The entire league could fund the whole Artemis program nearly twice. Hosting the Olympics is worth about 3-10 launches.

Like sports, the objective is ultimately useless except as a showcase of what humanity has to offer, and people like to see that.


Replies

Rebelgeckoyesterday at 7:52 PM

I think in general space exploration is a great use of taxpayer money, but the artemis program doesn't seem great from either a "science per dollar" or "novel accomplishment per dollar" standpoint.

If the goal was just to flex on the rest of the world I would've much rather we focused on going somewhere new or returning to the moon in a more sustainable way

show 2 replies
ApolloFortyNineyesterday at 6:43 PM

Even if you think Space travel is worth the money (which I personally do), adding humans to the mix makes projects incredibly more expensive. Even in the realm of space travel and research, sending humans is a questionable use of the money.

show 2 replies
palatayesterday at 9:02 PM

The difference being that sports are not exclusively paid by taxes, I guess?

show 2 replies
runarbergyesterday at 6:23 PM

I think there is a major difference though. Sports events are not pretending to be anything else. The Artemis mission claims to be advancing science and claims to be a stepping stone for an eventual moon base and a manned mission to Mars. I personally have serious questions about all of these.

show 3 replies