As somebody who has been around linux almost for as long as it exists, i must say that is a very strong statement.

In real life: systemd IS useful, Wayland is becoming (has become?) the default, ubuntu is the most popular desktop distro family.

> Canonical announced that they are no longer using Debian as a base, but the unvetted packages compiled and uploaded by random people on Snap.

Citation very much needed for this claim.

> Canonical announced that they are no longer using Debian as a base

When was that? I don't disagree that it appears to be the case (especially with replacing coreutils/sudo/etc and the... varied approach to .deb vs snaps) but I'm not aware of them saying it explicitly in those terms?

Is your name a reference to the Blizzard game? If so, I worked on that :)

You're not wrong, but tbh I'd move upstream to Debian. I use Termux on my phone (Z Fold) with Debian and XFCE, and have been extremely pleased with the performance. Combined with a folding keyboard and some AirNeo's, it's become a fantastic micro-development system that fits in a hand bag.

Not that I don't like Arch, it has a very few (subtle!) things that Ubuntu has solved recently, like eGPU hotplugging

If that means that package versions for commonly used tools are less than a decade old in the future that's probably a good thing though ;)

Snap is a mess, and treating "deb-based" like a purity test is funny when plenty of Linux users have dealt with abandoned apt repos and stale PPAs.

If you want stable, reproducible systems Nix is a serious option now. Ubuntu isn't dead. You pick the distro that breaks your workflow the slowest, then backfill the choice with a story about freedom or community to make the packge manager choice seem less accidental.