Well, they're able to do it; “allowed” to do it is an ambiguous enough phrasing that it's practically begging to have an argument whose crux is fundamentally about a differing interpretation.
The author suggests a legal remedy instead of a technical one.
Which is weird, because that is undeniably the hard way. Lobby Google to add protections to Chromium.
The author suggests a legal remedy instead of a technical one.
Which is weird, because that is undeniably the hard way. Lobby Google to add protections to Chromium.