logoalt Hacker News

philistineyesterday at 1:34 PM1 replyview on HN

Nice of you to decide we’re just parroting instead of thinking.

If the MacBook Air had a fan, it would be thicker and would need a bigger battery. It would then be the same, aside from the screen, from the base MacBook Pro. You are 100% correct. The fact it has no fan allows Apple to reduce its weight and thickness. Thus reducing its price. You’re absolutely right.

Fans in laptops are more and more a gamer pilled flight of fancy. Phones and iPads have shown they’re not a necessity.


Replies

dangusyesterday at 1:46 PM

Removing a fan reduces the price? By how much do you think? Is the Nintendo Switch expensive because of the fan?

Is the Nintendo Switch/Switch 2 a thick device? They are thinner than the MacBook Pro, and they have more space constraints than a MacBook Neo.

If fans in laptops are just for “gamer pilled” why does the MacBook Pro have one?

Do you think Apple can continue to grow their marketshare indefinitely if they continually ignore the 900 million PC gamers who currently own Windows PCs? The PC gaming market is the only one that has been growing since 2021.

https://www.techspot.com/news/106371-gaming-industry-hits-wa...

The iPad doesn’t prove anything, it’s routinely criticized for wasting its performance potential with inflexible and limited software. Its performance limits are never tested because you can’t actually do things on it in comparison to a full desktop OS.

My phone will regularly dim the screen, halt charging, and throttle performance when I’m out in a sunny day during the summer. You ever been to Miami? I would actually be interested in an actively cooled phone if it existed and would accept a device that was thicker.