logoalt Hacker News

ericmayyesterday at 8:09 PM1 replyview on HN

We're dependent on processing and refining, not the minerals themselves. Takes, from what I understand, 10-15 years to stand up that capability.

Overall EVs are great and all and that's what I have, but they're not addressing the underlying concerns and sticking with car-only or car-based infrastructure whether that's ICE or EV is a losing proposition.

> They're also just as much of a CO2 solution as electric trains are,

No, you need fewer electric trains to move much more people plus you don't replace the trains as often, &c, and then add in all the miles and miles of paved roads you need, parking lots, you name it. There's no way around this, if you care about the environment or care about human wellbeing you have to move away from car-only infrastructure like the US has and move toward more European models. And no, the geography isn't a challenge, most people live in urban areas in the United States, China is big too, and so forth.


Replies

bijowo1676today at 1:27 AM

10-15 years to stand up legacy refining capability, which is heavy in pollution.

China invested decades into research and has made significant progress in extra refined, four nines purity rare earth minerals, required for advanced industries.

They may be two decades+ ahead of US at least, plus the talent pipeline