logoalt Hacker News

sandworm101yesterday at 8:16 PM10 repliesview on HN

Come on flat-earthers. I know you are out there. Lets hear your crazy rant about how this is a fisheye lens on a weather balloon or a webcam atop the eiffel tower. Why can't we see the poles? And is that an ice wall on poking up in the lower-right quadrant of the disk?


Replies

YZFyesterday at 8:36 PM

"How to Talk to a Science Denier: Conversations with Flat Earthers, Climate Deniers, and Others Who Defy Reason"

https://www.amazon.ca/How-Talk-Science-Denier-Conversations/...

show 1 reply
layer8yesterday at 8:23 PM

Don’t you see the reflection of the studio lighting in the middle?

show 1 reply
christophilusyesterday at 8:43 PM

My guess is the answer is: We didn’t really launch Artemis. This is all CG.

show 2 replies
jgrahamcyesterday at 8:29 PM

There is no point engaging in any way with people who believe in such "theories". They are like trolls, the only way to deal with them is not at all. Don't engage, don't disagree, just nothing, total silence. One can choose to be a wilful edit and waste your life and time on complete bullshit, but the rest of us should just ignore those people completely.

show 1 reply
simonwyesterday at 8:32 PM

This was a fantastic YouTube video on flat earther beliefs from a few years ago: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JTfhYyTuT44

Spoiler - they mostly switched to QAnon instead.

gaurangtyesterday at 9:35 PM

Oh, wait, in addition to their usual conspiracy theories, now they can also claim that this is AI-generated!

itsalwaysthemyesterday at 8:24 PM

Flat Earth is a distraction or a way to ridicule any counter-narrative to anything scientific.

When a cosmologist says that a planet nobody can see exists and is made of x% helium and is y light years away etc etc with absolute certainty despite nobody being able to go there and witness any of it (look how wrong they were about Pluto’s appearance), then you can always just say “what are you a Flat Earther” and easily discredit any doubt I have in these extraordinary claims with underwhelming evidence.

Any idea you want the public to oppose, you can create and market an adjacent thing, like Trump. You can throw all the ideas you want to oppose in the Trump bucket and if anyone supports it it’s probably because they’re a Trump supporter right?

See you’re very very easily programmed, like clockwork.

show 6 replies
sphyesterday at 10:36 PM

[dead]

_adq2yesterday at 9:08 PM

Don't pay attention to "authorities," think for yourself.

- Feynman

slopinthebagyesterday at 8:37 PM

The only real difference between the "spaceflight" in the 1960's and today is that these pictures don't need to be hand painted - you can render them in Blender in a single day.

But yeah, sure. With the amount of fake stuff on the internet including AI image generation, we're expected to believe that the US government dumped billions of dollars into going to space when they could give the appearance of doing so for a few bucks in nano banana credits? Hah.

show 2 replies