logoalt Hacker News

doug_durhamtoday at 6:31 PM2 repliesview on HN

The article is a thought experiment. The author hypothesizes that Bob isn't getting the same benefit that Alice is getting. That hypothesis could be wrong. I don't know and the author doesn't know. It could be that Bob is going to have a very successful career and will deeply know the field because he is able to traverse a wider set of problems more quickly. At this point, it's just hypothesis. I don't think that we can say we need more Alices any more than we can say we need more Bobs. Unfortunately we will have to wait and see. It will be upon the academic community to do the work to enforce quality controls. That is probably the weakness to worry about.


Replies

MarkusQtoday at 7:37 PM

We do know. There have always been ways that people could avoid the painful process of learning, and...they don't learn.

Here's a competing thought experiment:

Jorge's Gym has a top notch body building program, which includes an extensive series of exercises that would-be body builders need to do over multiple years to complete the program. You enroll, and cleverly use a block and tackle system to complete all the exercises in weeks instead of years.

Did you get the intended results?

Wowfunhappytoday at 10:04 PM

Do you think you learn as much from reading summaries of papers as reading the full thing? Do you think you learn as much from asking a friend to write a paper as when you write it yourself?

show 1 reply