logoalt Hacker News

margalabargalayesterday at 12:53 AM1 replyview on HN

> Look, I'm not here to kink shame

> Making a bonus contingent on engaging in your fetishes is definitely not OK

And yet here you are shaming me for my kink of making compensation contingent on provided service...

Severance is compensation given up front in exchange for the labor/service of signing and following through with the severance agreement.

It is not compensation for work that was performed. It is compensation for work that will be performed.

It is not something you are entitled to by virtue of having worked somewhere. The company is free to fire you with no severance whatsoever if they want (in the US).


Replies

alteromyesterday at 7:27 AM

>And yet here you are shaming me for my kink of making compensation contingent on provided service...

The service to get a severance has been provided prior to termination.

You're aware that severance is commonly proportional to length of service, right?

Not length of expected lifetime after being fired.

Keeping one's mouth shut isn't a "service".

Neither is a non-compete clause, for that matter (which is illegal where I am), so better figure out how that is possible given that it perfectly fits your definition of "compensation contingent on provided service".

>Severance is compensation given up front in exchange for the labor/service of signing and following through with the severance agreement.

Calling putting a signature on a piece of paper and staying silent "labor" wins the Orwellian dictionary redefinition of the day for me.

Didn't know I was doing labor by doing nothing at all.

Pray tell, where do I get to perform such hard labor and get paid handsomely for it?

Hope the answer isn't "some of the companies that I performed labor for in the past" (in a normal, human, dictionary sense of the word "labor"), because the payment that you get after performing labor - and only after doing so - is called "compensation".

show 1 reply