logoalt Hacker News

phil21yesterday at 11:07 PM1 replyview on HN

I have used both my PCP and telehealth for prescription writing, never once have I used a compounding pharmacy.

It's slightly cheaper for me to use telehealth vs. billing through my insurance. The downside is it doesn't go towards my deductible of course.

The stuff you are describing are entire supply chains of a sort where you want a GLP-1 or perhaps a few other things like TRT. Those you are signing up for the drug itself, which happens to include the prescription part with it.

Telehealth can be used for any old medication you want. It removes the permission slip part of the process and replaces it with a payment gateway. If you have $75-150 you can just click some buttons and have a prescription for nearly anything you want at most a day later. This includes antibiotics, ADHD meds (getting harder on these), certain benzos, etc.

HIMS/HERS/etc. and their smaller ilk are super popular, but they are the tip of the iceberg.

Telehealth providers can certainly work with compounding pharmacies but not necessarily. If you are looking to get a prescription for Diazapam you are going to be getting that sent to your local Walgreens or whatnot.


Replies

kube-systemtoday at 3:31 AM

> It's slightly cheaper for me to use telehealth vs. billing through my insurance.

How? Usually PCP visit are cheap and everyone gets one for free.

> HIMS/HERS/etc. and their smaller ilk are super popular, but they are the tip of the iceberg. > Telehealth providers can certainly work with compounding pharmacies but not necessarily.

Yeah I’m aware there are a whole host of services telehealths provide but the primary reason people use them for GLP1s is to avoid the name brand cost.