logoalt Hacker News

prontoday at 1:18 AM3 repliesview on HN

"Code quality" here isn't referring to some aesthetic value. Coding agents write code that doesn't converge, meaning code that they cannot evolve after a while. They get to the point where fixing one bug causes another, and then the codebase is in such a state that no human or agent can salvage.

People who say they don't care about the quality of code produced by agents are those who haven't been evolving non-trivial codebases with agents long enough to see just how catastrophically they implode after a while. At that point, everyone cares, and that point always comes with today's agents given enough lines and enough changes.


Replies

signatoremotoday at 2:49 AM

> Coding agents write code that doesn't converge, meaning code that they cannot evolve after a while

That's not true, and I'm not sure what that even means. It's totally up to you the human to ensure AI code mergable or evolvable, or meet your quality standard in general. I certainly have had to tell Claude to use different approaches for maintainability, and the result is not different than if I do it myself.

socketclustertoday at 2:33 AM

Yep. Good quality, succinct code saves time and money. Always has and always will.

alexchen_devtoday at 2:21 AM

[dead]