It's not setting off any LLM alarm bells to me. It just reads like any other scientific article, which is very often soulless
It repeats a few points too many times for a professional writer to not catch it.
I don’t mind that they let an LLM write the text, but they should at least have edited it.
the subheadings are extremely AI IMHO
It repeats a few points too many times for a professional writer to not catch it.
I don’t mind that they let an LLM write the text, but they should at least have edited it.