logoalt Hacker News

redfloatplaneyesterday at 8:38 PM2 repliesview on HN

Assuming they would understand it as artificial - I think many people would think it's a human intelligence in a cyborg trenchcoat, and it would be hard to convince people it wasn't literally a guy named Claude who was an incredibly fast typist who had a million pre-cached templated answers for things.

But in general, yeah, I agree, I think they would think it was a sentient, conscious, emotional being. And then the question is - why do we not think that now?

As I said, I don't have a particularly strong opinion, but it's very interesting (and fun!) to think about.


Replies

horacemoraceyesterday at 10:27 PM

Because questions like this force us to hold up a very uncomfortable mirror to ourselves. It’s much easier to just dismiss.

show 1 reply
woeiruayesterday at 10:32 PM

Some people at my office still confidently state that LLMs can’t think. I’m fairly convinced that many humans are incapable of recognizing non-human intelligence. It would explain a lot about why we treat animals the way we do.