The text is from Wikipedia, which summarizes the ideas from the book, both of which have been linked/referenced in the comment already.
Comments on the Israel situation are my thoughts.
Is there anything else I missed?
Israel is simply protecting itself and the attack is retaliation to the islamic religious terrorism.
How is this book supports any thing even remotely in either favor.
If anything , this applies more to religious terrorists ie. Hamas.
Not to a national democratic state
Israel is simply protecting itself and the attack is retaliation to the islamic religious terrorism.
How is this book supports any thing even remotely in either favor.
If anything , this applies more to religious terrorists ie. Hamas.
Not to a national democratic state