logoalt Hacker News

jonas21today at 3:55 PM8 repliesview on HN

This is much less concerning to me than mass surveillance. If someone calls 911 and you need to send a first responder, why not send a drone to get there faster while a person is on their way?


Replies

rudhdb773btoday at 5:11 PM

Because today it will be used as a first responder.

Tomorrow a police officer will suggest that these drones (that we are already using successfully) could be very useful for checking up on that "dangerous" neighborhood.

show 3 replies
sheiyeitoday at 4:06 PM

As a concept, first responder drones are a good idea. But I wouldn't want public services having anything to do with that company.

pesustoday at 4:21 PM

If the drones are "providing information" to the police, it's only a matter of time before their AI hallucinates something that gets someone killed. We've already seen AI gun detection services that report things like Doritos bags as guns.

show 2 replies
wiethertoday at 4:08 PM

At least their current cameras are fixed to a single point.

With their drones they now have cameras roaming freely everywhere.

dmbchetoday at 4:58 PM

What's the drone gonna do?

show 1 reply
chapstoday at 4:27 PM

I'm sorry but, in what way is a swarm of surveillance drones NOT a mass surveillance system?

zoklet-enjoyertoday at 4:08 PM

And then what? Hover over me as I'm dying?

show 1 reply
jeffbeetoday at 4:07 PM

Yeah this doesn't bother me in any way, shape, or form. We already have manned aircraft that respond to such things, unmanned aircraft are a strictly better solution. It makes sense for police and it makes even more sense for fire. An aircraft can arrive at the site of a reported fire while firemen are still buckling their pants.

show 2 replies