Yeah you’re trying to win an argument, I’m trying to find what’s true.
I won’t lose time trying to understand what your tech poser logic is trying to piece together. Hiding your source is not how you secure software. It’s how you pretend to be secure for your shareholders.
That’s the main reason open source software is more secure than closed source. You don’t need to hide secure code, it actually makes it less secure because less good actors will be able to help you secure it.
It won’t change a thing for malicious actors.
So again, for people who might read this, he’s very, very wrong.
>your tech poser logic
lol
>I’m trying to find what’s true.
i am telling you what is true, straight from someone with significant experience in the related fields.
>Hiding your source is not how yous secure software.
not once have i said that hiding your source = secure software.
you are intentionally ignoring and misrepresenting what i have said. i do not understand why.
>So again, for people who might read this, he’s very, very wrong.
for the context of other readers, i worked in cybersec for over a decade and now teach networking for the cybersec and game design programs at a post-secondary level (also in the pure networking program, but that is less relevant).
my opinions in this comment chain are not claims i came up with on a whim. i am happy to discuss them in more detail with anyone who has questions, provided that you will actually read what i have written instead of flailing around.