logoalt Hacker News

picafrosttoday at 4:54 PM3 repliesview on HN

Life on this planet will be OK. Throughout geologic time countless species have gone extinct. The Anthropocene might be tragic for the natural world but not terminal.

But: what are we trading it for? Higher living standards for more people is a noble and good but I don't think there's evidence it requires this rate of ecological destruction. Have we ever seriously tried to decouple growth from extraction?

I'm not convinced a solar punk future exists where technology will eventually close that gap in time. Maybe it will. So far it seems that every efficiency gain gets swallowed by expanded consumption. What seems most probable now is that we don't get a better world but the same dirty one plus a Starbucks on Mars.


Replies

metabageltoday at 5:03 PM

> The Anthropocene might be tragic for the natural world but not terminal.

I'm not so sure. I'm reminded of this quote:

“How did you go bankrupt?" “Two ways. Gradually, then suddenly.” ― Ernest Hemingway, The Sun Also Rises

metabageltoday at 5:00 PM

Plus, we are in the process of making parts of the earth unlivable for humans.

show 1 reply
fiddeerttoday at 5:03 PM

[flagged]