logoalt Hacker News

pikeryesterday at 8:06 PM6 repliesview on HN

Such a law illustrates the beauty of federalism. Texas and other states can have them if they want them! Maine has not nearly as much space and much more natural beauty to protect [per square mile], so it can and maybe should have a different set of rules. That's cool.


Replies

pj_mukhyesterday at 10:53 PM

This is a recipe for creating dead retiree states. Just NIMBY everything, NIMBY the power sources[1] [2], then complain about a lack of power so NIMBY any type of new industrial <anything>.

Now do this for housing, new sources of water anything a person younger than 40 would need and you basically get a state full of retirees..and oh would you look at that! [3].

Now the question is, why wouldn't all states eventually do this with the way our population pyramid is looking? It's basically rabid conservation and tragedy of the commons writ large.

[1]: https://www.mainepublic.org/politics/2025-04-08/bill-removin...

[2]: https://www.reuters.com/world/americas/maine-voters-reject-q...

[3]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_U.S._states_and_territ...

show 9 replies
seniorThrowawayyesterday at 8:08 PM

Don't know why people think Texas doesn't have natural beauty. It's a huge state.

show 8 replies
adamsb6yesterday at 11:43 PM

Maine banning datacenter construction is is a bit like Texas banning lobster fishing.

show 1 reply
mancerayderyesterday at 11:40 PM

Isn't it cheaper to cool a datacenter in a more temperate/cool region than one that has a 9-month-long summer?

Why would anyone want to go to Texas to build a datacenter and worry about the cooling, when they could pick any other state?

show 2 replies
alex43578yesterday at 8:10 PM

[flagged]

show 2 replies
Acrobatic_Roadyesterday at 9:46 PM

They sure have a right to enact policies that keep them economically & demographically irrelevant.

https://cdn.xcancel.com/pic/orig/638FA4CD35438/media%2FF5jNt...

show 2 replies