logoalt Hacker News

Moving from WordPress to Jekyll (and static site generators in general)

40 pointsby rgrieselhuberyesterday at 8:59 PM17 commentsview on HN

Comments

brokegrammertoday at 1:08 AM

Wordpress is better because it's easy to setup these days, can be fast if you enable caching, and has a comment system, which is a big deal if you want people to interact with your content. Other things like contact forms can easily be added. The CMS is also amazing.

With SSGs, you have a few options for comments, like Disqus, but the ad-free version costs money, it's slower because it needs to load JS, and your comments are owned by a third party company. Contacts forms can be built by integrating an external API. And anything else that requires storing data will require an integration with a third party service of some sort.

SSGs are a great concept but they're mostly for nerds who get boners by seeing over-engineered systems. They're also great for companies like Cloudflare because they can sell you services that come for free with Wordpress (CMS, image uploads, databases, workers, etc). For serious blogging, I'd opt for Wordpress.

show 2 replies
sumaneptoday at 1:33 AM

Well, I migrates from wordpress to... Google Sites recently so...

alwillisyesterday at 10:47 PM

Been on the Jekyll bandwagon for a long time now; it's my go-to static site generator.

show 1 reply
pseudosavantyesterday at 10:20 PM

I recently retired my Wordpress blog and replaced it with a static-site generator. My requirements were straight-forward and I ended up having Codex build it for me.

It was the last thing using MySQL, PHP, and Wordpress on my site. 3 big things to not have to keep up-to-date and secured. I can check in markdown to my repo, it builds the site, and Nginx serves it. So fast, and secure.

winddudetoday at 1:06 AM

I did something similar, but killed my old WP blog. played around with 11ty, sveltekit, i eventually settled on hugo.

mc007yesterday at 10:42 PM

interesting, we went from classic CMS to Jekyll, then Hugo, then Astro and finally built our own CMS - for larger sets of content and sites. Fiddling with custom DSLs, templates, weird builds and tricks ... was just way too time consuming - unthinkable my wife would ever touch it or write an article in there :)

Have a look at https://service.polymech.info/user/cgo/pages/poolypress-cms, agentic CMS, translates, creates and manages articles with a few prompts, widget aware.

donohoeyesterday at 9:52 PM

I don’t get it. Their setup is so much more complicated and limiting than what they had on Wordpress.

I won’t argue with their reasons to move (which don’t stack up for me either but agree to disagree).

show 1 reply
rmorizyesterday at 11:59 PM

I have a legacy WP blog that I wanted to migrate to some static architecture for ages but IMHO users should be able to comment and maybe even post a pingback. I know, old MT days. But social media is always about getting (positive) comments and feedback, not just dropping statements and knowledge.

I also don't want to tie my site to disqus or other 3rd party cloud services and their implication on GDPR.

show 1 reply
AlienRobottoday at 1:03 AM

I feel this article is more about all the tools they built with AI than about moving to Jekyll. None of these tools required the move in first place, since they could have literally just dumped the DB.

purplehat_yesterday at 9:57 PM

what's the advantage of a static site generator over pandoc + makefile?

show 4 replies
KaiShipsyesterday at 10:29 PM

[dead]