logoalt Hacker News

voidUpdatetoday at 9:10 AM5 repliesview on HN

I enjoy how moon-landing deniers will use the van Allen belts as a reason for why the astronauts could not have made it to the moon because of radiation exposure. Like, you don't believe NASA that they went to the moon, but you believe NASA that the van Allen belts exist?


Replies

rsynnotttoday at 12:25 PM

Strictly speaking, their existence was verified by Sputnik 2 (though the Soviets only released data on it after the fact, corroborating data from Explorer 1), so if you have a highly _specific_ conspiracy theory, around NASA rather than space stuff in general, that _could_ still work, I suppose?

show 1 reply
arowthwaytoday at 11:00 AM

I'm not disputing that conspiracy theorists tend to lack rigor but there is a full spectrum of positions between "space is fake" and "one specific extraordinary achievement with high incentive to fake it is fake".

show 1 reply
joeslidetoday at 10:15 AM

[flagged]

JumpCrisscrosstoday at 12:09 PM

Any entertaining “Artemis II is a hoax” takes?

show 4 replies