logoalt Hacker News

jcranmertoday at 2:01 PM1 replyview on HN

Every other field in history considers it de rigeur that you're liable for the failure of quality in the products you produce. You make drugs that hurt people? You're liable. You build a building that falls down? You're liable. You serve coffee that literally burns the people drinking it? You're liable. It's also not new--the Code of Hammurabi (some 6000 years ago) prescribes the death penalty for people who build houses that fall down and kill the inhabitants inside.

It's only computer scientists who think it's some unreasonable burden to be held liable for the consequences of their work.


Replies

Ajedi32today at 3:46 PM

It is an unreasonable burden to ask the impossible. The technology to create an AI incapable of hurting people if misused or blindly trusted literally doesn't exist right now.

It'd be like holding a builder liable for their bridge being unable to withstand being hit by a meteor.