FYI, you started out with a very common word used to exaggerate or cherry-pick the opinions of enemies ("giddy").

It's more valuable to discuss grievances than to pretend they are simply un-discussable in the wake of related violence (in the vein of "it would be disrespectful to talk about gun control in the wake of gun violence").

>This is simply not how the economy works, if everyone is poor who do you think is paying for products/services leveraging AI?

Well, this is already the economy right now: the very upper class is owning more than the vast majority, and consuming more than the vast majority.

"The top 20% of earners now make up over half of consumer spending"

https://www.axios.com/2025/08/08/stock-market-us-economy-ric...

>also means you are opting into homelessness, famine, cancer, climate change, etc. pretty much everything that we could solve with ASI.

All these could be stopped right now but many people don't want to. Your ASI is going to give the same answers scientists have been reviled for saying: tax more, don't let the free market decide everything, est less meat and drink less alcohol, consume less in general.

Human stupidity is the real problem and ASI isn't going to "solve" anything.

> AI? If everyone is broke because all the jobs got automated, who is buying the products to supply revenue to the companies

Does it matter if you're already a rich oligarch with generational wealth? All these ceos have enough money to last several decades beyond their life span, it doesn't matter to them is the slave class croaks