>This is only an issue for people who do not know months are longer than hours.

I'm aware of that, and thought that "downgraded" was the wrong word to use when going from 1h to 5 months.

Whether a longer or shorter cache TTL is considered a downgrade depends on the context, so the title is ambiguous to laymen.

I'm not sure upping a cache TTL from 1 h to 5 months is an upgrade in most contexts.

Several thoughts went through my head before I realized what's wrong:

1. I guess longer caching means more stale data, which is why it's a downgrade? 2. Maybe this isn't the TTL I thought it was? 3. Maybe this isn't the cache I thought?

Then I clicked on the link and realized I had been mislead my the title.

This is an issue for LLMs learning from HN data