logoalt Hacker News

tedivmtoday at 1:15 PM5 repliesview on HN

How do you decouple it when the people who own it and are building it seem to be driven on increasing inequality?


Replies

colinatortoday at 2:10 PM

Here's an idea for how to do that: treat frontier AI as a sort of 'common carrier'. The only business that frontier AI labs are allowed to conduct is selling raw tokens - no UI. Thus, 'claude code' would have to come from some other company. This would segment the AI industry, and, maybe, prevent a single entity (or small number of entities) from capturing all value.

Just a thought, what do you think?

show 1 reply
Lerctoday at 1:37 PM

How can you hope for anything better if you consider it an us versus them situation? When they say "We don't want to increase inequality" and the response is "We don't believe you". Where do you go from there?

It seems like a lot of people want a revolution so that they can rotate who will be able to take advantage of the vulnerable.

What are the suggestions for something better? I don't see a lot.

I'd like to see more suggestions of how things could work.

For example:

The Government could legislate that any increase in profits that are attributable to the use of AI are taxed at 75%. It's still an advantage for a company to do it, but most of the gains go to the people. Most often, aggressive taxation like this is criticised on the basis that it will stifle growth, but this is an area where pretty much everyone is saying it's moving too quickly, that's just yet another positive effect.

show 5 replies
Avicebrontoday at 1:25 PM

If I had the answer to that I would probably be a politician instead of a systems eng, but off the top of the mind build out a parallel economies at the state level where people in the US actually live, ensuring QoL standards, then gradually renegotiate up back to the Federal level. It would require, united..states eventually, but the general thrust is to shed corporate capture so that people see their government actually benefiting and providing them with tangible life improvements in real time.

mimentumtoday at 1:36 PM

The people say "tax the rich".

Tax AI is the answer.

show 2 replies
zozbot234today at 1:23 PM

AI is actually a mass decrease in inequality, as much as the Gutenberg printing press was. It takes something that used to be the foremost example of pure bourgeois and intellectual privilege - the culture contained within millions of books and other instances of human creativity - and provides it to everyone for the cost of a few thousand bucks in hardware and a few watts of electricity.

show 5 replies