The interstate commerce clause is just craziness. It touches everything and gives justification to regulate nearly anything.

> Another case based on interstate commerce: the US ban on racial segregation.

Specifically the federal ban on private segregation. The states would still be able to ban it.

Moreover, is that the sort of thing you even want as an ordinary statute dangling precariously off of the commerce clause instead of making it a constitutional amendment to begin with?

I wouldn't be surprised if this one unironically goes given that Uber/Lyft are fully doing "women only" ride shares now.

Gen Z / Alpha have embraced X-"realism" and fully accept essentialism/reject "intersectionality". They're far more conservative/prudish than millennials, even at their young age.