logoalt Hacker News

0xbadcafebeeyesterday at 1:51 AM1 replyview on HN

It works like any other case of liability. If the seller is in the US, the seller is held liable if they transfer to a foreign entity who isn't accountable to US laws (because the user/customer would have no recourse if the buyer does something evil). Opposite is true if the buyer is in the US. If only the user is in the US, there's not much they can do but use the courts or politicians to try to get justice overseas. If no party is in the US, our laws don't apply.

I must not have been clear, I'm not saying you only hold one party accountable. I mean all parties engaged in a specific kind of contract or agreement would be liable. Since it's a transfer of ownership, and the law would specifically be intended to protect people who are at risk because of that transfer, both parties would need to ensure the law was followed, or both parties would be putting those people at risk.


Replies

weird-eye-issueyesterday at 2:12 AM

So you want people who sell a business to be open to liability for things that the new owner does? Don't you see what kind of negative consequences that would have?

show 1 reply