logoalt Hacker News

landr0idyesterday at 2:39 AM4 repliesview on HN

>At the same time, the larger tech companies (Meta and Google, specifically) ended up building off of hg and not git because (at the time, especially) git cannot scale up to their use cases.

Fun story: I don't really know what Microsoft's server-side infra looked like when they migrated the OS repo to git (which, contrary to the name, contains more than just stuff related to the Windows OS), but after a few years they started to hit some object scaling limitations where the easiest solution was to just freeze the "os" repo and roll everyone over to "os2".


Replies

MASNeoyesterday at 5:28 AM

“roll everyone over to os2”

The IBM crowd may feel vindicated at last.

miki123211yesterday at 7:43 AM

So 30 odd years later, MS went from working on OS/2 to working on OS2?

I guess what's old is new again.

w0myesterday at 4:29 AM

didn't msft write an ~entire new file system specifically to scale git to the windows code base?

I have fuzzy memories on reading about it.

show 2 replies
kqryesterday at 4:43 AM

I have heard that the Google monorepo is called google3 but I don't know why. Maybe those things are common...

show 3 replies