logoalt Hacker News

faangguyindiatoday at 9:48 AM4 repliesview on HN

I backup my data to s3 and r2 using local scripts, never had any issues

Don't even know why people rely on these guis which can show their magic anytime


Replies

CodesInChaostoday at 10:31 AM

* S3 is super expensive, unless you use Glacier, but that has a high overhead per file, so you should bundle them before uploading.

* If your value your privacy, you need to encrypt the files on the client before uploading.

* You need to keep multiple revisions of each file, and manage their lifecycle. Unless you're fine with losing any data that was overwritten at the time of the most recent backup.

* You need to de-duplicate files, unless you want bloat whenever you rename a file or folder.

* Plus you need to pay for Amazon's extortionate egress prices if you actually need to restore your data.

I certainly wouldn't want to handle all that on my own in a script. What can make sense is using open source backup software with S3/R2/B2 as backing storage.

show 1 reply
ralfdtoday at 10:05 AM

> Don't even know why people

Most people (my mom) don't know what s3 and r2 is or how to use it.

palatatoday at 10:03 AM

This. I use Restic, the cloud service doesn't know about what I send, it's just encrypted blobs as far as it is concerned.

show 1 reply
bjordtoday at 10:02 AM

you don't understand why pre-rolled critical backup solutions might be appealing to (especially non-technical) people?

also, you pay per-GB. the author is on backblaze's unlimited plan.