logoalt Hacker News

ArcHoundyesterday at 11:25 AM5 repliesview on HN

AFAIK the idea is to have backups so good, that restoring them is just a minor inconvenience. Then you can just discard encrypted/infected data and move on with your business. Of course that's harder to achieve in practice.


Replies

supertropeyesterday at 2:59 PM

If the important data is in a web app and the Windows PC is effectively a thin client, this lowers the ransom value of the local drive. Of course business disruption in the form of downtime, overtime IT labor cannot be mitigated by just putting everything online.

The next step is just to move to security by design operating systems like ChromeOS where the user is not allowed to run any non-approved executables.

If tricking a single employee can cause an entire company to stall out, it's a process issue. Just like how a single employee should not be able to wire out $100,000.

show 1 reply
finghinyesterday at 11:40 AM

Sleeper agent malware is a thing especially in high risk situations. If somebody has a dormant RAT installed since year X-1 it’s going to be impossible to solve that in year X by using backups

show 1 reply
Veservyesterday at 6:35 PM

That does not work. They just infect you and do not demand a ransom for a few months as they encrypt all your data going to the backup. Now your backups are also encrypted going back multiple months and you have to discard months of work.

show 1 reply
billypilgrimyesterday at 2:46 PM

Modern ransomware are not just encrypting data but uploading them somewhere too, the victim is then threatened with a leak of the data. A backup does not save you from that.

show 2 replies
mschuster91yesterday at 11:26 AM

In the end the limiting factor will be the bandwidth of your disk arrays... enough compromised machines and they will get overwhelmed.