Nitpick: that’s trademark, not copyright. While it’s bundled under IP, it’s a different beast altogether.
The above claim was in fact regarding “intellectual property”. If you break it down, there are plenty of IP rights which make a lot of sense.
Here’s one for copyright:
“Do you think any corporation should be allowed to make closed source forks of GPL software?”
alt Hacker News
The above claim was in fact regarding “intellectual property”. If you break it down, there are plenty of IP rights which make a lot of sense.
Here’s one for copyright:
“Do you think any corporation should be allowed to make closed source forks of GPL software?”