>reviewed by humans can be perfectly good, maintainable, and indistinguishable from regular old code
That depends on the 'regular old code' but most stuff I have seen doesn't come close to 'maintainable'. The amount of cruft is proper.
Another good example of "the people writing good code with AI are the people who could have done it regardless"
Another good example of "the people writing good code with AI are the people who could have done it regardless"