What’s next? Are they going to forbid the use of Intellisrnse? Maybe IDEs in general?
Why not just specify all contributions must be written with a steady hand and a strong magnet.
What's next? Forbid cribbing from your neighbor in an exam? The audacity!
They simply don't want people like you and lose nothing.
> Whats next
To show you your hyperbole: Allowing monkeys on typewriters.
LLMs are neither IDEs nor random.
I am very sceptical about iterative AI deployment too. People pretend the success threshold is vibing somethging that gets widely used, but its more than that. These one-shot solutions are not project maintenance. Answer yourself this one, could LLMs do what the linux kernel cummunity did over the same time span? This would be a good measure of success and if so, a strong argument to allow generated contributions.