> If that's true, then we're following the timeline

Literally just a citation of Meta's Coconut paper[1].

Notice the 2027 folk's contribution to the prediction is that this will have been implemented by "thousands of Agent-2 automated researchers...making major algorithmic advances".

So, considering that the discussion of latent space reasoning dates back to 2022[2] through CoT unfaithfulness, looped transformers, using diffusion for refining latent space thoughts, etc, etc, all published before ai 2027, it seems like to be "following the timeline of ai-2027" we'd actually need to verify that not only was this happening, but that it was implemented by major algorithmic advances made by thousands of automated researchers, otherwise they don't seem to have made a contribution here.

[1] https://ai-2027.com/#:~:text=Figure%20from%20Hao%20et%20al.%...

[2] https://arxiv.org/html/2412.06769v3#S2

Hilariously, I clicked back a bunch and got a client side error. We have a long way to go. I wouldn't worry about it.

Care to expound on that? Maybe a reference to the relevant section?

That's not supposed to happen til 2027. Ruh roh.

Only if you ignore context and just ctrl-f in the timeline.

What are you, Haiku?

But yeah, in many ways we're at least a year ahead on that timeline.