alt Hacker News> I want to be fair to Cal.com here, because I don’t think they’re acting in bad faith. I just think the security argument is a convenient frame for decisions that are actually about something else. […] Framing a business decision as a security imperative does a disservice to the open-source ecosystem that helped Cal.com get to where they are.
That sure sounds like bad faith to me.
Replies
LoganDark • today at 4:28 AM
Bad faith requires you to intend it badly, though, not just for it to be bad.
➕ show 3 replies
This rest of the article contrasts the with "I don’t think they’re acting in bad faith"
This bit stands out to me:
> You can’t take five years of community contributions, close the gate, and claim you’re grateful. I don’t think it works that way.
I think it's safe to say that Sam is not impressed with the the Cal.com decision and the way they framed it.