logoalt Hacker News

AnthonyMouselast Friday at 11:09 AM1 replyview on HN

> Vendors shouldn't sell unlocked devices to kids.

This part is neither necessary nor sufficient.

Put aside the Orwellian premise of "devices are locked by default". People keep making the analogy to things like cigarettes, but if a kid wants a steady supply of cigarettes then they need a steady supplier. If they want an "unlocked device" they just need money and Craigslist, once. It doesn't matter what you make Walmart do and it correspondingly doesn't make any sense to involve them.

If your kids have enough unsupervised money to buy electronics then you're either fine with them being unsupervised or you already have bigger problems than a used laptop.


Replies

ndriscolllast Friday at 11:35 AM

Kids having $20-30 means you're fine with them being unsupervised? Computers and smartphones are incredibly cheap.

In person, we expect stores won't sell cigarettes to kids. We should simply expect companies won't provide age restricted services to kids. The liability and requirements should be on those companies.

show 3 replies