logoalt Hacker News

jgbuddyyesterday at 7:28 PM8 repliesview on HN

What would the alternative have been? Not reporting that they were purchased at all?

The premise here seems to be that spacex purchased the trucks for the sole purpose of inflating the tesla reporting, which of course makes no sense from a business perspective


Replies

browningstreetyesterday at 8:01 PM

Elon keeps doing things that make no sense from a business perspective and he’s defended by people who exclaim it couldn’t have happened like that because it makes no sense from a business perspective.

nitwit005yesterday at 8:51 PM

The general behavior of doing things that don't particularly make sense from a business perspective, to make numbers look better, is unfortunately common. People exploit it by doing things like trying to get a discount near end of quarter.

solarkraftyesterday at 10:17 PM

“This makes no sense” => “I don’t understand the purpose”

The most obvious motive is juicing the numbers.

aucisson_masqueyesterday at 10:10 PM

> The premise here seems to be that spacex purchased the trucks for the sole purpose of inflating the tesla reporting, which of course makes no sense from a business perspective

I think you missed the part where Tesla is overevaluated and any bad news could utterly crush it's share value.

qq66yesterday at 10:48 PM

It makes no sense? When the companies have the same CEO?

none2585today at 12:07 AM

lol bro

Fucking of course it makes sense they are both owned by Elon.

benj111yesterday at 7:34 PM

Except when the CEO of publicly owned Tesla gets paid based on performance.