logoalt Hacker News

wolvoleoyesterday at 8:24 PM5 repliesview on HN

Doing something like that at planetary scale is science fiction anyway even if we did have the tech to do it.


Replies

GuB-42yesterday at 11:58 PM

To put it into perspective, we are effectively terraforming Earth today, though maybe not in a good way.

We have converted most of the land to agriculture and released maybe trillions of tons of greenhouse gas in the atmosphere, there are 8 billions of us working on it. And what did we do? Increased the global temperature 2 degrees? Made the sea level rise a couple of meters?

It may be bad for us, but compared to terraforming a planet like Mars, that's nothing, and we have the entire humanity industrial complex to do it while on mars, we need to build everything, starting from a hostile environment.

baqyesterday at 9:23 PM

Talking to computers and expecting computers to answer coherent English was science fiction 4 years ago. Don’t lose faith

show 4 replies
generic92034yesterday at 9:07 PM

I would not be so pessimistic. Look what the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyanobacteria have done for our atmosphere.

wincyyesterday at 10:10 PM

Maybe we’ll turn all of Mars into paperclips with our efforts! Glorious paperclips. First Mars, then the universe!

naravarayesterday at 9:02 PM

If you can kick off self-sustaining biological processes it’ll happen on its own eventually, but you’d just be looking at generational time scales to do it.

Of course you’ll probably have lots of side-effects.