logoalt Hacker News

ck2yesterday at 7:28 PM5 repliesview on HN

What's the statute of limitations on such things?

Because it won't be prosecuted by 2029 but could be afterwards

Personally I think it's a bigger problem when the President sues his own government for billions and then orders them to pay it out

Because -that- is not an official act. It could be prosecuted but no-one will touch it even after 2029


Replies

cheschireyesterday at 10:35 PM

Doesn’t matter. They’ll be pre-pardoned.

https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/5829203-presidential...

TZubiriyesterday at 11:28 PM

War crimes probably have their own statute of limitations.

cbg0yesterday at 7:36 PM

Unless somebody snitches there's no real way to prosecute insider trading. You can say you just felt like making a trade, or that you read one of Trump's posts the moment he put it up on Truth Social and you just happened to have the trade ready to go.

Unless they're absolute morons, the people doing insider trading for large sums of money will have already built a strong alibi.

show 5 replies
SwellJoeyesterday at 10:35 PM

Given Trump has promised blanket pardons for any illegality from his administration during his term, I think the question will be whether pardons for crimes not yet investigated/charged are covered by the pardon and whether anyone will pursue those investigations and convictions.

Democrats have historically not really been willing to do anything if there's any plausible sounding reason for doing nothing, so I'm guessing they'll jump at the opportunity to wave away the insider trading stuff. Let bygones be bygones, you know, in the spirit of bipartisanship and comity. They slow-rolled prosecuting the crimes of the first Trump administration. So slow that he was re-elected before anything began to happen.

Budtoday at 12:24 AM

[dead]