Did you find the article lack any real numbers related to the claims? It was a bit weird in that that information was so vague.
Individual tragic anecdotal incidences aside the vagueness of the article really diluted the merit of the claims.
Is this an AI comment? The article is talking about a court case. All the information is public. I don't think you trained your FUD bot to correctly read/respond to the article. It seems to be making generic comments
Is this an AI comment? The article is talking about a court case. All the information is public. I don't think you trained your FUD bot to correctly read/respond to the article. It seems to be making generic comments